Showing posts with label Lewis Towers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lewis Towers. Show all posts

Friday, December 30, 2016

DAVID HANKS- 2016 SAUK VILLAGER PERSON OF THE YEAR



SAUK VILLAGER PERSON OF THE YEAR! This award is established to honor a person who has made a significant impact to or for the Village. Just as Time Magazine had honored Adolf Hitler and Joe Stalin in 1938 and 1939, respectively and most recently named Donald Trump for 2016 as their persons of the year, I choose David Hanks as the Sauk Villager's Person of the Year 2016. David Hanks' announcement in September to retire from politics may be the most significant single impact to the Village’s future!

This announcement was the biggest and most historic announcement of the year in Sauk Village and was cautiously and hopefully expected by many. (CLICK HERE to see Video)  (CLICK HERE- to read the story) It could be the impetus for voters to bring to an end the Village's continued political turmoil which began back in May, 2009. 

Hanks fell into the office of mayor on the heels of Lewis Towers' disgraceful resignation on November 8, 2012.  In Towers' wake, Towers left a trail of financial woe; leaving over $1,000,000 in unpaid bills in addition to a General Fund Deficit totaling over $1.2 million. Credit is to be given to the then sitting Board of Trustees who were diligent in preventing Towers from illegally using the $3 million balance in the water fund.  David Hanks and the Trustees that support him, however, have managed  to erase that $3 million reserve by voting for the same illegal usage of the water fund that they were so diligent in preventing Towers from doing.  As a result, this lame duck Mayor will likely leave office with over $1.7 million owed to the water fund, in addition to over  $1 million in unpaid bills. 

Hanks financial incompetence was further exacerbated when he appointed his staunchest trustee supporter, Rosie Williams to the position of Finance Committee Chair, after two of his Trustees loss their re-election bids in 2015.  Hanks, with the help and guidance of Trustee Rosie Williams, have been using water fund revenues to pay for expenses unrelated to water, causing an even greater fund balance deficit of nearly $1.7 million today!

The Village has been on a steady decline since 2013 because Hanks has had full control of the Board of Trustees and they have historically voted in lock step for every major decision that affects the Village. Even with Hanks' appointments of a Village Administrator, an assistant for the Administrator, his Finance Director and appointing him an assistant, with all this manpower, the village should have expected a vast improvement over its finances.  Instead, the Village's financial staus is on the brink of insolvency!

The Hanks' legacy will be marred by other questionable and scandalous events; too many and too big to mention here.
But today Hanks gets the honor of being 2016 Sauk Villager's Person of the Year for announcing he would retire from politics and more importantly, for keeping his word!



Past Honorees:
Click the links below to read those stories






Thursday, June 16, 2016

BURGESS HONORED FOR DECADE OF DISTINGUISHED SERVICE

DERRICK BURGESS (center) receives honors for 10 years of
Service to Sauk Village.  From Left: Nathan Griffin- SVCPA,
Tammy Jones- SD168, Rita Kueny- Former Trustee, Burgess
Sharon Davenport- SD168, Judy Cast - PLAN and
Philip Bazile- President School District 168
SAUK VILLAGE |  Residents and community leaders turned out Wednesday evening to Trustee Derrick Burgess' monthly Town Hall Meeting, but the tables were soon turned on Burgess.  As people began to arrive Burgess began to increasingly became surprised and soon knew there was a plan underfoot.  As Burgess started his Town Hall Meeting, fellow Trustee Cecial Tates came to the podium and took over as the plot began to unfold.  Burgess soon discovered there would be no Town Hall Meeting, but found out instead that he was being honored for serving 10 years as a Village Trustee.

Community leaders Nathan Griffin, who serves as president of the Sauk Village Citizens for Public Awareness and Judy Cast who serves as president of People Looking for Answers Now (P.L.A.N) both congratulated Burgess and thanked him for his service to the people of Sauk Village during the presentation.

Former Trustee Rita Kueny, whose seat Burgess was appointed, spoke during the event.  "At the time he was appointed, I think Derrick actually attended more Village meetings than most of the elected officials".  Kueny recommended Burgess for her seat on the Village Board before her resignation.  "I don't think I would have resigned if he (former Mayor Roger Peckham) didn't appoint Derrick" Kueny said.  Burgess was appointed to Kueny's seat by Peckham on June 13, 2006, was re-elected in 2007, 2011 and by the biggest majority in 2015.

Former Trustee Joseph Wiszowaty also congratulated Burgess for his service.  "Derrick has the passion and resolve that very few officials have.  Derrick Burgess truly loves Sauk Village" Wiszowaty said.

School District 168 Board President Philip Bazile, Vice President Marva Campbell-Pruitt, along with Board Members Tammy Jones, Sharon Davenport and Jimo Kasali were on hand to present a Resolution to Burgess for his 10 years of "unwavering support for Community Consolidated School District 168".  Campbell-Pruitt read the resolution during the presentation.

State Representatives Elgie Sims, Marcus Evans and Thaddeaus Jones were unable to attend,
Trustee Cecial Tates presents the Resolution of the
Illinois House of Representatives to Trustee Burgess
however, they wrote Resolution 1318 of the Illinois House of Representatives expressing their esteem and appreciation for Burgess' 10 years of service to the people of Sauk Village.  Tates read the resolution followed by a standing ovation as Tates presented it to Burgess.

Former Mayors Roger Peckham and Lewis Towers, sent their regards but sent their written congratulatory cards via Trustee Tates.

"I'm very sorry I was unable to attend due to my schedule, however, I want to congratulate and thank Trustee Derrick Burgess for his ten years of service" Former Trustee Francine Anderson said.

After receiving 2 plaques of "distinguished service" from the people of Sauk Village, Burgess was finally allowed to speak. He thanked his "best friend" and wife, Juanita and acknowledged his 4 children Arleta, Derrick Jr., Steven and Erika and 4 of his 14 grandchildren that were present.  Derrick Jr. called from North Carolina during the presentation to congratulate his father.  It was a very moving moment.

Juanita Burgess (center) wife of
Trustee Derrick Burgess looks on as
her husband Derrick addresses the
audience during the presentation.
"I was completely surprised by all of this, I had no idea" Burgess said.  "I am truly honored and humbled to serve the people of Sauk Village".

A host of family and friends presented Trustee Burgess with a dinner reception held at the Paesel Community Center immediately following the presentation.





Friday, August 7, 2015

HANKS AND SOME VILLAGE OFFICIALS ACCUSED OF RETALIATION - EEOC CHARGES FILED

DAVID HANKS (left) and Village Attorney Mike McGrath
by Joseph Wiszowaty
SAUK VILLAGE |  Deputy Chief of Police Rebecca Sailsbery a 23 year veteran of the Sauk Village Police Force has filed an action with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, required before a Federal lawsuit can be filed, claiming she is being retaliated and discriminated against by Mayor David Hanks, Administrator JW Fairman and other Village officials.

Following the abrupt retirement and resignation of former Chief Timothy Holevis, Sailsbery has been blocked from being sworn-in as "acting/interim chief" which should have happened automatically according to the department's general orders until a new Chief was appointed.  Instead Hanks ordered Sailsbery to assume the duties but not the position or title.  Sailbury argues that it is because she had previously won an EEOC complaint and the Village settled with her, Holevis and former employee Lisa Gibbons.  Gibbons was "layed off" and not recalled despite the Village having several opportunities and hires since her so called layoff.  In 2010, during the administration of Lewis Tower when former Chief of Police Frank Martin was terminated, Holevis was sworn-in as "acting/interim" Chief of Police.  Holevis at that time was not the deputy chief but the senior Sergeant on the day shift.
Apparently the discrimination and retaliation did not end there according to the complaint.  Gibbons has already filed another EEOC complaint against the Village.
Hanks, according to the supplement to the EEOC complaint, violated the Police Department Chain of Command, posted a notice that Sailsbury would remain Deputy Chief "until further notice" while all other police officers would retain their positions, violated the Police Officers Bill of Rights as an investigation was conducted without notification.  Finally the supplement to the EEOC complaint states that Hanks "traditional" views of women in the workforce are frowned upon and are expected to wear skirts instead of pants.

Sailsbury has stated she did apply to become chief of police.  According to Hanks 24 people have applied for the position.  Hanks appointed Fairman along with Trustees Rosie Williams and Cecial Tates to serve as a committee to search for a Chief of Police.  "We have yet to have a formal meeting with all of us present" Tates said.  According to Tates they were given each candidates resumes and asked to rank each candidate.  None of the results were shared with other committee members according to Tates.  "Not like any committee I had ever been on when you never meet to discuss anything" Tates said.
"According to the Mayor he gets to make the appointment the Village Board vote doesn't matter" Tates said.  "He has made that quite clear when it came to appointing committees and the courts already ruled on this same matter with former Village employees which the village is still in litigation over.  So let's just cut out the nonsense and move forward" Tates said.
Hanks has made no public comment regarding the EEOC complaint which was filed in earlier of this year.

Saturday, August 2, 2014

WHO IS BEST AT SELLING A LIE? "Forward Motions" or "The Choice is Clear"?

actual campaign piece from 2009
Opinion Editorial
By Joseph Wiszowaty
Remember when Lewis Towers was running around with Debbie Williams (I know such a cute couple of something) saying “the Choice is Clear”?  Boy that sure sounded good!  Sauk Village was going to get some Lake Michigan Water!  Now I'm not here to critique Lewis Towers, after all he's gone. 

The Towers Team actually won! Now they had no plan and no idea what to do with it, how to pay for it or how to go about getting it!  But this was your leaders in 2009 pulling a big con-job on the residents of Sauk Village!  Catchy campaign slogans sure sound good during elections but similar to the last administration, David Hanks had no clue what to do once he got what he wanted and sat in the big boy seat!  Keep in mind he'd been sitting as a Village Trustee for 14 years!



Now I have been critical of this administration because clearly it is disengaged and not leading using  broad generalizations such as “Forward Motions” and you’ll hear David Hanks at ever meeting  say “things like that….”.  Here are some instances of  “things like that” which Hanks believes are  “forward motions”:


 

·         If home burglaries are down because criminals have already picked through a neighborhood and moved on to another, never mind they're still going on…That’s a “forward motion”!

·         If one of the thousand dead trees falls over during a bad storm and takes itself down… that’s a “forward motion”!

·         If Hanks can get 5 bobble heads to approve a budget which denies transparency and will likely cause an even bigger problem later… That’s a “forward motion”!

·         If you can give a huge tax break to a absentee landlord who doesn’t take care of their property and has refused to do so…. That’s a “forward motion”!

·         If you can con people into thinking the village is better off now when property tax rates are nearly double…  That’s a “forward motion”!

·         If you can send Village Clerk Debbie Williams, her daughter Rosie Williams and a friend a Village Vendor to Washington D.C.... (***CLICK HERE*** TO LINK FOR TRAVELGATE) and not allow for transparency and let the public know how this was paid for and more important who paid for it and then pay for the Village's legal team to fight to keep it private in spite of the fact the Illinois Attorney General determined you MUST provide it… That’s a “forward motion”!

·         If you pay independent contractors, that a Housing Commission (which is only suppose to enforce Fair Housing) contracted without the approval of the Village Board of Trustees, for mowing grass on vacant homes and pay them out of the water fund and nobody seems to really care that it’s illegal to do so the way they did it… That’s a “forward motion”!

·         If you can raise water rates and tell people you’re going to fix the old infrastructure with the money, then take the money and balance the Village’s budget… That’s a “forward motion”!

·         If Hanks can’t get black folks to come out and support his political agenda… he'll USE one of HIS bobble head trustees to drum up some support for him so he can give them some free hot dogs and water in a raggedy park…. That’s a “forward motion”!


·         If you can charge a punitive an capricious fine of $500 without due process to the victim because another state did not update their records.... That's a "forward motion"!

·         When you support one of your trustees who allows the community center to become a flop house destroying the place and smearing fecal matter on the walls… That’s a “forward motion”

·         If Hanks promotes another trustee’s Neighborhood Watch program that merely watches the increase in crimes in the neighborhood… That’s a “forward motion”

·         When you can support another trustee openly displaying the lack of reading abilities by residents’ children and promote it as a success… That’s a “forward motion”
When Hanks took over in November, 2012 he could have walked backward and things would have been an improvement from what was in there.  But one must ask, why were things so bad during Towers administration to begin with?  Well let’s take a look at the “political dynamic”.  Hanks sat on the village board and was, according to some media sources, Towers’ “main critic” and critical he was!  If Lewis Towers said the sky was blue, David Hanks would argue and call him a liar or stand over him and threaten to stick the gavel in Towers “butt”.  Sure Towers was a megalomaniac for whom I was equally as critical but no more than Hanks is an opportunistic, misogynistic, hedonistic liar!

Now I was informed that Hanks put out on his personal social media page that he’s actually going to run for re-election and wants people to support him helping him raise money!  Really?  This man is crazy!  He hasn’t done squat and wants people to rally behind him and his gaggle of idiots again?  Don’t be fooled twice!  These are anything but “forward motions”!  This is just political theater, orchestrated by David Hanks himself!  Don’t buy into the nonsense any more.

“Forward Motions” is about as muddy as “the choice is clear….” As Roger Peckham said in 2005, when David Hanks ran for Mayor and lost… “Don’t Drink the Koolaid” a throwback to the Jamestown mass religious suicide.   In 2009 the "choice was clear" and it wasn't...  Today we know Koolaid is not clear... and neither is the direction that Hanks has been taking the village! Well, I couldn’t agree more Roger... don't drink the Koolaid! 

Friday, May 16, 2014

WHAT A DIFFERENCE A YEAR MAKES- Lynda Washington

By Joseph Wiszowaty
SAUK VILLAGE |  It has been one year now since Freshmen Village Trustee Lynda Allen-Washington-House was sworn-into office to serve the people of Sauk Village.  Let’s take a look back at what the “candidate” Washington said during the elections and what she has done since taking office.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lynda Allen-Washington-House
·         Age:  56
·         Occupation:  Administrative Assistant West Harvey-Dixmoor Schools
·         Married to:  Terry L. House
·         1731 E. 223rd Place
·         Homeowner/Renter:    Renter
·         Property Taxes Paid:  $ 0.00 per year
·         “approximately” 21 year resident
·         First Elected: April, 2013
·         Term in office Expires:  2017
 
Let’s look back at Lynda and where she has come from, where she’s been the last year and what may lay ahead.
 
Washington took it upon herself to run for office in 2011 and allied herself with what some felt were dubious allies.  Washington, a virtual unknown in Sauk Village, ran with the New Progress Party slate of candidates supported by former Mayor Lewis Towers and former Village Trustee Enoch Benson.  Washington often stated during Village Board meetings “Mr. Mayor you’re doing a fine job”.  Washington was advocating the passage of a Lake Michigan water referendum along with Towers and Benson. Washington came up way short in her electoral experience garnering 382 votes losing by a 3 to 1 margin in 2011.
 
Following the devastating defeat she suffered at the polls in 2011, Washington announced she was divorcing her long-time husband and went about to “remake” her political image.  In an attempt to dust off her association with Towers and Benson and ingratiating herself with villagers such as Gary Holcomb, who sits on the McConathy Library Board and the late Patricia Hasse’s son Tom Hasse who helped tone her down a tad here and there and give her “credibility”. 
 
Washington credits both Holcomb and Hasse for her victory, but keeps most of the credit for herself, after all she did all the hard work.  In 2013, Washington did a bit better than 2011 by garnering 45 more votes than former Village Clerk Elizabeth Zupon and just 81 more votes than her 2011 loss in a crowded field of candidates.
 
Washington set out immediately after her loss in 2011 trying to gain credibility and continued to campaign hard to get elected.  Washington was appointed by one of her supporters former mayor Lewis Towers in November, 2011 as Chairperson of the Neighborhood Watch program. 
 
Washington being put out of the "Independent" Slate's office in 2013
During the 2013 election Washington stated “I plan to work with the other Trustees and Mayor to bring pride and Progress back to Sauk Village.  There are very serious issues that are of great concern to the residents of Sauk Village.  My main focus is Quality Programs for our youth.  Enhancing programs for our Seniors and bridging the gap with more police presence in our community to provide public safety”.
 
Well, Washington has worked with very well with Mayor David Hanks, not asking questions during village board meetings of any substance thus far.  To many of her now former supporters, she has been a disappointment.  “She goes along with whatever the mayor wants and doesn’t ask questions” one resident said at a recent Village Board meeting.  Another calls her a “bobble head”.  “She sits up there ever meeting and just bobbles her head yes whenever the mayor wants something” they said.  While the criticism is nothing new for politicians, Washington is living up to her commitment of not only working with the Mayor but appears to have gone above and beyond her pledge in support for the administrations initiatives, whatever they may be.
 
When asked to do an interview with me about the 1 year anniversary of her taking office, Washington said “I would like for the Mayor to sit in”.  I informed Washington I did not want to do an interview with the Mayor I wanted a one on one interview and her response:  “Regretfully because of the many responses I have gotten from the article you wrote about what I said regarding deputizing citizens… I am not going to be able to interview with you.  I thought it would be cool but I do see as several people pointed out Joe twists things” Washington responded.  Well there is no twisting what she said, nor what she has done and what she has failed to do over the last year.  Residents are left to draw their own conclusions and see the results of her actions or inactions.
 
Washington stepped on a land mine when she suggested deputizing citizens, Police Chief Timothy Holevis responded the next week to Washington’s statement emphatically say there would be no such deputizing civilians on his department.
 
During the election Washington’s “main focus”, so she said, was for quality programs for the youth.  To date there have been no new programs instituted by the Village in the last year nor any suggested by Washington publicly.
 
Washington biggest achievement since taking office has been getting her Neighborhood Watch signs posted at the entrances to the Village.  She did raise the money to cover the cost of the signs through fundraising, so we have been told.  Washington chairs the Neighborhood Watch which was elevated to a committee of the Village Board in June, 2013 by Mayor David Hanks.  Most communities do not have Village Trustees running Neighborhood Watch Programs, most of the time they are run by the residents and work closely with the police department directly.  The Neighborhood Watch Committee meets at the Fire Station. 
 
Washington’s most recent self appointed project has been to get a video together in hopes to make everyone “happy” and forget about all the problems of Sauk Village.  The video will feature the song “Happy” by the artist Pherell Williams.  I’d asked Washington why she’s doing this video, how is this going to help the village she responded because she was tired of the negativity and I want to be happy.  Some long-time residents ask “Why is she so happy?  Our property taxes keep going up, we dodge potholes and our kids have no programs so we have to go to other communities for them to do things during the summer because my child doesn’t play basketball”.
 
We will continue to keep a close eye on Washington as many residents of Sauk Village will also do.  We wish Washington and Sauk Village the best of luck.

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

PROPERTY TAXPAYERS GOING TO PAY MORE



By Joseph Wiszowaty
SAUK VILLAGE |  Village officials took action at their meeting Tuesday to ensure the Village will receive their property tax revenues in 2014.  The board voted 5 to 0 for the 2013/14 Property Tax Levy.  No residents or Village officials asked any questions about the Tax Levy Ordinance.

The amount of property taxes requested in the levy was $3.2 million according to Mohan Rao after the meeting.  “The Village can levy the lesser of 5% higher or the CPI (Consumer Price Index) which is at 1.7%” Rao said.  This year the Village’s levy is 1.7% greater than last year according to Rao.

Mayor David Hanks now faced the same predicament as his predecessor former Mayor Lewis Towers faced by taxing Sauk Village property taxpayers even higher.  The cash strapped Village has been borrowing from other funds just to make payroll and pay bills and once again is raising property taxes even higher than the tax-capped Village is usually allowed.  Once again, the Village has had to levy higher than the 1.7% tax cap allows to cover the bond payments for the Village Hall which officials had to borrow millions to build without seeking voter approval.

The Average struggling homeowner was billed an extra $136 to cover the Village Hall bonds.

Longtime Village resident Edward Sullivan said earlier this year, in published reports, “I don’t think it was right.  If anything has to do with my money, my taxes, my home – yes, I should have a right to vote on whether I want it or not” Sullivan said.

Originally the impact fees  from the Logisticenter were projected to pay for the Village Hall 2007 Series A bonds, however, the revenues fell way off their mark.  The problem is that the projections were dead wrong and property taxes are automatically raised to make the bond payments as the Village’s “full faith and credit” is used to cover the debt service on the bond’s repayment.

Taxpayers are also on the hook for a total of $46 million in these “Alternate Revenue Bonds” some of which were used to fund improvement in the Village’s Logistic Center.  The Tax Increment Financing Districts revenue thus far have been more than adequate to cover the debt service on these bonds.



Alternate Revenue Bonds make two promises.  The first promise to is to the residents that the payments likely won't end up on the property tax rolls, with the money instead coming from another source, such as impact fees, utility or sales taxes. The second promise is to the lenders that if the town's initial plan falls apart, as has been the case in Sauk Village, property taxes will go up to make payments and they have been.
 
Original material copyright 2013 Sauk Villager News; all rights reserved.

Village Hall costing property taxpayers $5 million as Village sidesteps the property tax caps